Cryptocurrency Market Reset?

Dear Readers,


They’re great, right?

Not always, but in a few “lines” we can really pick up a lot. Not so with words.

So here is my first chart of the day. It plots the market capitalization of the top five (current) cryptocurrencies from January 1, 2018 to February 14, 2018.

It helps you keep things in perspective.


What do you notice, besides all the ups and downs and such? (Above.)

Hint. Look at the last dip. About February 6, 2018.

What do you see?

A bit closer now.


Is this a market “reset” of some sort?

If not, it is interesting how the top three are nearly equidistant now.

In any event, if you peruse the upper chart, you will see which “coin” seemed to bounce from the resets very quickly.

I wonder if history will repeat?




Data Source:

Bitcoin v. Gold v. Tether

Correlations are easy to visualize at times. One can see that recently, with few exceptions, many cryptocurrencies marched in tandem. In the early days, this was not the case. Most cryptocurrencies moved in a seemingly random price pattern, in the beginning.

Perhaps it is because of the scope of investments flooding into the cryptocurrency markets today. The institutional investors are beginning to push real value into the system, with the real risk of serious downtrends, should the brokers receive the “sell all” order from their clients.

In any event, the recent run up and “half-bubble” burst of bitcoin has made for interesting discussion. One I have not seen yet, is a discussion of bitcoin breaking the gold trend line and what happened when it did.

When I state the “gold trend line,” I’m using Google Trends to plot “interest” or “searches” of a word or a sets of words. There are many available combinations and the sales of mined data is big business. To the uninitiated, trying to find the correct setting – to use the trends to your advantage – can be a bit disconcerting. So, keeping it simple might be your solution.

Or you can read the tea leaves. Pig entrails? Clif High, Webbot supporter? Palm Reader enthusiast?

I use the gold (as a chemical element) trend for comparisons. Not “gold as an investment,” but that is another option. I also set the trend for a worldwide search. Now, you can use long-term or short-term settings, say 90 days or even a year.

Recently, after plotting various trends, I wanted to see if there were any patterns or correlations between “gold” and “bitcoin” (search topic). From November 1, 2017 through December 31, 2017 I found a curious thing. (See chart below.) Bitcoin has broken the gold barrier.

Can we then estimate future bitcoin prices, based upon its “interest” and its relation to gold trends? How about bitcoin interest v. Monero interest?

Well, based on the data set below, not exactly.

1 - Copy(Source: Google Trends – 60-day Time Set. Please see Google for an explanation of their data sets.)

Now, in many countries, this was the end of tax season, but in the United States, the tax laws recently changed – were clarified. It was, of course, decision time.

Do I hold, now that I am penalized for trading crypto for crypto? Do I sell, and take my tax lumps, before the end of the year? Do I trade into gold or a private untraceable cryptocurrency? If I do elect to hold private cryptocurrency (Monero), should I expect a price spike, because everyone else is probably thinking along the same lines, or will regulations kill off the last hold-outs and make the above-board cryptocurrency substitutes (Ripple, Stellar etc.) surge? (Not really.)

And there are other factors. Inflation. Whole countries outlawing cryptocurrencies. Cryptocurrency exchanges being ripped-off. Exchanges disappearing or going offline, without warning (Binance). So, by no means is the above trend interpretation authoritative.

Let’s just focus on the gold trends and bitcoin’s relation to it, during the time-frame in question. That’s November and December of 2017.

2 - Copy

As you can see above, the gold trend line was broken by bitcoin on at least three separate occasions, when comparing the chosen data. November 27, 2017, December 2 – 3, 2017 and again on December 29, 2017. The question is, did the above trend “predict” the coming surge in bitcoin prices or at least hint at the possibility? Or was bitcoin issuing a warning?

One can see that the Monero interest trends barely budged. It didn’t seem as if people were thinking about privatizing.

November 27, 2017. What was happening? According to here, bitcoin closed at $9,818.35 that day. It had been surging before that, having closed at $6,559.49, on November 13, 2017. It had already risen over a third in value in short order.

What about December 2 – 3, 2017? $11,074.60 and $11,323.20 closing prices, respectively. Even in a trough of “interest” bitcoin was surging in price. People were not searching for bitcoin as much. Why? Were they holding? Watching on

On December 29, 2017 bitcoin closed at $14,656.20. Was the breaking of the gold trend line, in reverse, a signal of a future downtrend? Not immediately, if at all. Bitcoin surged to over $17,000 by January 6, 2018. After that, however, it began to retreat. As of February 12, the closing price of bitcoin was $8,926.57.

Let’s add some more info, focusing on the breaking of the gold trend line, in gray.

3 - Copy

The above chart illustrates bitcoin’s closing prices on the given date ranges. You can immediately see that the first peak of search interest over the gold trend line correlated to a very small value increase. We must remember, however, people searching for bitcoin will then need to figure out how to buy it, if they were new to the game. In any event, there appears to be a lag between “interest” (positive or negative – we do not know) and price changes.

As bitcoin broke the gold trend line on November 27, 2017, prices surged a little, initially. Then, within less than a month, the price of bitcoin more than doubled. By December 16, 2017, bitcoin closed at $19,497. A surge of over 100% in price. Why couldn’t it go higher?

Would a reasonable person have understood that such a surge in interest via trends (searches) would translate into higher bitcoin prices, when the gold trend line was broken? Again, how can we know? One can search for bitcoin for many reasons. For reasons “not to buy” and for reasons of education, as well. Let’s face it, though, something urged many people (or bots?) to type in the word: bitcoin. Were people fearing that they might miss out. “FOMO” in colloquial internet-speak? Were we being manipulated into thinking that bitcoin interest was surging?

In the old days, just after bitcoin hit the cryptosphere, a 100% increase in price would have been considered, by percentage, no big deal. Today, however, such an enormous surge is in the billions of dollars – not mere millions. It is serious. Don’t let the oldies fool you.

Bitcoin appeared to be on track to hit all-time highs daily, after the gold trend line was broken. Bitcoin was running hard, until about December 18, 2017 – when the cryptosphere began to suffer one of its worst collapses on record – when you factor in the amount of money invested — and now divested.

So, what happened?

From over 300 billion dollars in capitalization, bitcoin halved in a matter of weeks. Did bitcoin touch the “golden trend line” and was it punished for doing so? Since gold trends correlate with US Dollar “interest” trends, was bitcoin’s popularity a threat to the financial order?

Was this one of the greatest pump and dump schemes in history? The “Tether” play, as some have indicated. Pumping up the price of bitcoin by simply “printing” phantom, worthless Tethers — and buying? Then cashing out to fiat? (Not unlike any government that deals in fiat currency.)

We no longer use gold as money, therefore there is very little utilitarian value to gold at all, except as a safe-haven asset, provided it is not confiscated. Did bitcoin touch the US Dollar “third rail?”

But let’s set these aside for a minute. What else was going on the day bitcoin began to eat crow?

News, Before the Fall

Was there anything that was happening on December 18, 2017 or shortly before, that may have changed people’s minds? Some introduction of “panic” or market manipulation?

December 13, 2017:

December 18, 2017:

The gist of it?

Wall Street was reporting that economists didn’t like bitcoin, big investors were selling bitcoin, fedcoin was looming, bitcoin myths were being exposed, bitcoin corrections were coming, Tether was probably scamming billions, and socialist countries were bitching because they couldn’t get in on the action.

A perfect pre-panic or a conspiracy theory?

One last chart for your perusal. As bitcoin’s interest was driving hard these past several months, it approached the US dollar interest line, at speed. Like the gold interest line above, bitcoin pierced this dollar trend line. There has been conjecture about this as well.

Did bitcoin’s sudden rise act as a market-dollar barometer in advance? Knowing that the dollar was and is devaluing, that gold prices have been (and may still be) manipulated,  and that the markets are overheated, to say it mildly — did bitcoin signal the alarm? Maybe. At least that’s one take. But why divest of crypto, if you think gold and the DOW Jones Average are headed for the drink? Cash under the mattress? More than likely.

4 - Copy

(Source: Google Trends.)

Finally, if Tether is printing phantom dollars and they do it responsibly, is it any different than any fiat currency in existence — aside from the fact that it is privately managed? Can it replace the dollar and at the same time, support cryptocurrency? Can it replace POS cryptocurrencies, that are also created out of thin air? How about POW crypto’s that are created by gamed-computer-mining?

In any event, I’m at loss to explain how Tether made bitcoin surge 100%, to 300 billion dollars in value, in a month, when Tether’s market capitalization has never exceeded three-billion dollars. Churning? The fact that investors could (can) “fall back” to Tether, if BTC faltered? Hello? There aren’t enough Tethers in existence.

I suppose one could take out an option, but the Tether spreads must be useless, unless you have millions to play with. Help me here, financial gurus. If everyone agrees that each Tether is worth one US dollar and there are no dollars actually backing up them up, at what point do investors lose confidence?

No wonder the US Government wants to eat Tether’s lunch. It’s a competitor.

Who is Crypto’s real enemy? Ask yourself that question.

The above is my opinion and conjecture. Don’t bet your house on it.


GNU Taler “Manifesto”

This is an open letter to those who slave at the coding machines, whilst Richard Stallman drinks the Kool aid. Get up from your machines. Awake from your fantasy.

Burn the manifesto. The Taxable Anonymous Libre Electronic Reserve Manifesto.

Avoid Taler, like a Bit-plague.

Dear GNU Taler and Family,

Idiots are made, not born. Until now? Leave your Communes. Lay down your laptops.

I urge you, if you have ever entertained, for a second, buying Taler. Snuff that thought from your mind. Eliminate the code from your systems, before it’s too late. Politicians lurk herein.

GNU Taler could replace things like SWIFT and even Ripple, if they ever get off the ground.

Without going into the details, suffice to say that Taler (Taxable Anonymous Libre Anonymous Reserves) does have promise. Not everyone wants to hide their money, just secure it. But can Taler deliver?

I hope not. I don’t live in a commune. I will not support any form of subservience, even in the name of “Social Responsibility,” which is another name for “Socialism,” which is another name for “slavery,” which is what “Taler” is to money. Control and servitude. The vile, are the merchants.

I’ve been watching Taler’s cheesy vids for a few years now. Odd, the German laced rhetors are. Like they stipulate, it’s just a cash substitute. Is it? A token of state money, which has already failed us. But, not really. You will need to buy Taler at the going rate, from what I can see. That is, whenever they can lift off, which I hope is NEVER.

In that sense, would it not be volatile?  Or are they simply going to designate the equivalent cash? How then, will the exchange rate be calculated? Will one U.S. dollar buy me one or ten Talers? And, given the new tax laws in the United States, would it not behoove Taler to indicate how much I paid for my Taler and how much I sold it for, to buy a soda? So, I can keep track of gains and losses – and required taxes? Or will Taler help me hide that? Like a good Communist? Like an Anarchist? Which is it?

If I want to spend my Taler in a foreign country, will the exchange rate be dictated? Or do I estimate what I think the item should cost, based upon the fiat cost of my Taler, in my country? Will Taler rise and fall in value, according to the amount purchased, globally? Will my Taler be inelastic, holding its original fiat value or elastic – dipping and spinning like a herd of crazy sheep? Who knows?

Their website – after all these years – seems absent the basic stuff needed for any serious investor to make a decision. (Don’t worry, I’ve emailed them for more.) How many ‘coins’ will they print? Just the 100,000,000? Who decided that? Why? How are the “T’s” associated with fiat cash? Will they offer them for sale on cryptocurrency exchanges, even if Taler is NOT a crypto? Will they offer hardware wallets? Cell phone apps? Or must we keep them on our very safe computers (PC’s)? Make back-ups?

Unlike Ripple XRP’s, however, you must deal in TaL or “T” or whatever their ticker symbol is today. With XRP’s or even Stellar Lumens (XLM), I can send you any currency and you can receive any currency, but we’re all visible. Capisce? That’s good and bad.

Taler, as I understand it, can be spent like cash – your identity is private – but the merchant must report the income. Big deal. You are still screwing the economy (Richard) – the evil shopkeepers. The shopkeepers are the economy! If it wasn’t for them we’d all be wearing Stallman tie-dyes, tilling the fields, and sipping monkey juice. Stand up and smell the ozone, buddy – before the Global Cooling starts.

Like Ripple, like Stellar, Taler is centralized, but even more so. Is that a bad thing – if it is secure? And, if it becomes successful, could not a large company or government simply buy them out – and use their system? Or simply copy it? I understand it is ‘open source.’

I feel like I’m watching the old “Moron Movies” where the guy takes his log for a walk and it pisses on a tree.

How about the “premine?” From what I can see here and elsewhere, Taler holds 49% of Taler. Fine. If the value appreciates and I can profit, I don’t care. I might even like to use the system to help keep my identity safe. Help me save money too. And I can bring my own rope too. Hang myself out by the shed, as the sun sets on my freedom and the merchants all quit. We’ll all hang together, is that it?

It seems that Taler is an underdog. It is sneaking in under the radar, with a political agenda. Possibly able to unseat the old guard, with code. A manifesto of money? Taste not, Dear Bankers, for the libation is death — figuratively speaking.

At the same time, the developers of Taler don’t seem to understand that governments (police) will, on occasion, require the identities of “spenders.” That fact alone will create a push-back mechanism they may not comprehend. Or, if they do, they already have plans in place to reveal the tax-evader citizens, the wannabe-terrorists. After all, privacy is only a human right, until you harm others or anger the wayward bureaucrat, right?

Let’s move on.

Bitcoin and cryptocurrency in general, I argue, was created to combat a dying fiat monetary whoredom. The world over. Taler says, capitulates, that here is a way to use the whores of finance – cheaply. Great message. Taler supports the cat-houses. It is NOT socially responsible. Or, put another way, it supports inflation, social slavery and has no guts — no shame. Did you here that Richard? I say you have no cojones. Please program Ethereum Kitties.

I hope Taler, Ripple, Stellar all fail. In the meantime, I will profit from their success. Not unlike Schindler.

Correction: I hope to hell, I will never profit from Taler.

The old system must die. I await the new. But not the GNU way.

And a simple browse will uncover the plot. Check here. Richard Stallman, oh guru of gurus, supports the US Green Party. He, Richard of riches, is the “creator” of Taler. The Green Party is essentially a Neo-Marxist party. A slavery Party. The antithesis of a freedom-loving people.

Beware the hippies in the red tie-dyes.

Die Taler, die. A natural death.

Your Friend,


Three Predictions for Cryptocurrencies in 2018: “SPACE”

What’s Next?

Many people ask where cryptocurrency is heading. I thought I’d take a moment here and delve into that. A bit of forward conjecture.


Because I can’t seem to find it all in one place. Just bits and pieces of negative and positive elements. So, I jammed a few of them in here. And it’s all my opinion, of course. Take it with a smidgen of rock salt.


1. The CCE’s will Official-ize and DCE’s will not matter

Centralized Cryptocurrency Exchanges (CCE’s) may not survive in their current form. The year 2018, in the United States, will test their mettle.

Why? Tax laws, crypto-friendly countries, atomic swaps, and:

Decentralized Cryptocurrency Exchanges (DCE’s).

In a recent interview by an unnamed person, as not to disparage the name of a particular CCE, it was learned that things like atomic swaps and/or functional DCE’s are years into the future. That is, according to the CEO of this particular CCE. That centralized and regulated exchanges are better suited for a servile public and institutional investors. Regulation is acceptable.

Bull. We have grown up now. Training wheels are not handcuffs.

Some CCE’s even pride themselves for their transparency. They put a face to their company. They stand upright and walk on two legs and pay their taxes as all good citizens should. Even if the monetary system is rotten to the core. Don’t you dare try to improve it.

The anti-government stance seems to worry the CCE’s. Just be nice and trade, they ask. We are all in the same sinking boat after all – the CEO says from the crow’s nest — as the waters rush in.

But let’s face it. If a CCE decides to go transparent, it has no choice. The business model they chose, for good or ill, requires that they follow and not lead, at least in the U.S. In the U.S., CCE’s must create and maintain a KYC, AML compliant trading platform or face prosecution. It’s that simple. No submarines allowed. Surface ships only, please. Even if we lose the war.

Add to this CCE mix, the recent 2018 U.S. tax law clarifications regarding cryptocurrency trading and one can speculate as to the true motives behind a certain unnamed CCE’s recent announcement that they are moving in the direction of U.S. Dollar trading – for most users. And that they are apparently seeking to offer actual securities (stocks and bonds) in the future.

Why? They are losing money – or soon will be. They need you to buy and buy now. The sooner the better. Use lots of cash. And, as the tax laws kill the cryptosphere in the U.S., the CCE’s will “evolve.” No, Mr. CCE, you will capitulate. You will spring backwards, to the safety of the fiat. And there, you will die Mr. CCE, for lack of verve and vision.

And that leads into the DCE’s. In their current incarnation, they are worthless or nearly so. Dead on arrival. You must pledge a bit of expensive bitcoin, choose a third party to settle disputes and wait forever. DCE’s are slow to improve, unprofessional, not user-friendly and untrusted.

Perhaps the new impetus will be the desire for free trade, unhindered by the regulations and onerous tax laws.

But we need something more.

2. The U.S. New Tax Laws will be Ineffective

Translation: Cryptocurrency trading is slowing down. U.S. customers especially, are not trading like they used to, because they know that each time they do so, they can no longer claim a “like-kind” exchange. In other words, the tax hit is helping to drive cryptocurrency prices lower. It is also killing the centralized exchanges – which could be a good thing.

U.S. based CCE’s must now shift into another gear if they want to stay in business. Aside from the threat of atomic swaps and DCE’s, the fact that trading will continue to slow because of tax laws, means that the CCE’s will begin to consolidate and/or offer more services.

This is already happening. It’s called survival mode. The hangover after the party. Luckily, there is still plenty of booze left, but it’s cheap booze now. Bitcoin is no longer as “top shelf” as it once was. Bitcoin Cash continues to hammer away.

These new tax laws, reduced trading and the bubble-popping amusement ride, is soaking value from the CCE’s, at hyper-speed. Where once, the cryptos flowed like champagne into the golden baths of the CCE’s, it now dribbles in as diluted, headache-inducing, sparkling wine, from the Left Coast (California).

As a result, expect CCE membership fees to emerge, large balance requirements, the wooing of institutional investors with unpublished deals, and the farming-out of the expensive retail arms to other companies, especially where labor is cheap. Expect more ads.

The net effect? The little guy will be left holding cryptocurrency he cannot trade, without first signing his life away. Should the little guy hold private coins, he will be suspect. Where will any freedom-seeking individual go?

This is why I feel that the new U.S. Tax Laws will be ineffective. They will make a show of it, force the crypto lovers underground, arrest a few, let the problem fester, and in the end, they will wake up with a new money. It is simply a matter of time. Even the dinosaurs died out.

Sophisticated traders and gamblers might hire third-party fictions to hold their crypto, but the vast majority will not be able to entertain such extravagant schemes. Tax loopholes are for the affluent.

3.The Rise of “SPACE”

If you live under a rock, you’ve never heard of a DCE. That’s fine. Maybe atomic swaps are your thing. Or even Atomic Coin, which is another altcoin. But I don’t think you’ve heard about this next idea. It’s not about another blockchain.

Spontaneous Private Atomic Cryptocurrency Exchange(s)? Or: S.P.A.C.E.

It does not yet exist.

I predict we will see the beginnings of SPACE in 2018. It will be a combination of a CCE, DCE, Atomic Swaps, and best of all, it will be anonymous and untraceable. Imagine a private-Amazon with its own Monero-like cash that spends everywhere, instantly. Making fiat superfluous. (I’m an optimist.) Where you can store your crypto in the new cloud and access it where ever SPACE is used.

Already, we are seeing hints of this. Cloakcoin. Litecoin in talks with Monero? Some countries creating their own internet, with different protocols. Sharding altcoins, like MaidSafeCoin, just to name a few.

They all seem to miss the mark however. They all must ground themselves to the given ICANN. What if they didn’t? What if SPACE was created as needed? You initiate a private connection to a flexible network where there are no third parties. You buy, sell or trade instantly. Your choice of payment (coin) is saved, privately. And you disconnect. There would be no fees, no records, save your own and no limits. Everything would be automatic, anonymous, user-friendly and secure. Once the developers released such a network into the wild, it would, like bitcoin, be maintained in a similar manner.

Therefore, the next big thing, at least in the Cryptosphere, will be way out there. Beyond the current internet completely. A quantum leap and a human achievement that could set the stage for the next leap forward. That is the idea, isn’t it?

Will you be ready for SPACE?



Fiat Virus v. Cryptocurrency

Seriously, nobody has a clue what’s next.

And I’m not trying to sell you on any one cryptocurrency. In fact, I’m open minded. I’ve no problem at all, if you voice your opinion herein. I’m not selling a thing. Not trying to pump or dump at all.

If you are like me, however, you’ve read and thought and read and invested…and scratched your noggin. Who can you believe? Is it too late to invest in crypto?

You know the answer. You can only trust you. Not Roger Ver, Eric Voorhees, Charlie Lee or Vitalik Buterin. Not Gavin Andresen or the Winklevoss Twins, but little old you.

“…the right time to come aboard…”

And for the record, I think that this space will continue to grow and that the right time to come aboard will be when you are damned well and ready.

You’ve waded though the articles, the graphs, experts and pumper-news. Then, as you sit there, sip your coffee and eat your bagel, sign onto your favored exchange or market, you make your trading decisions. And that’s that. It’s all about you, because there are no financial advisers in the new world. Even the professor types advise you to keep abreast of all the changes.

A turkey-shoot. You decide to gamble on bitcoin or hold as close as you can to a more traditional approach. Say Ripple XRP’s. Maybe a little EOS, spiced with some ADA (Cardano). A side of Ethereum perhaps.

Then you read more of the negative crud.

If you are a bank, you know you are losing when you must label the other guy as risky, however. That’s what JP Morgan-Chase and other threatened financial organizations are doing. It’s all part of a larger ploy (or plot, if you prefer) to stop the financial bleeding. But I could be way off the mark, right? Maybe the old guard won’t lose this round. What about the next one?

“…the final shakeout…”

Think about it. We could be witnessing the final shakeout in the cryptosphere. The next Amazon or eBay is right before our eyes, but we can’t see it. What’s more, the thing we are looking at can change how all of us save, spend, are taxed, and in the end, maybe even how free we will become. And you define the “we.”

Just how big could a cryptocurrency become, if it successfully replaces fiat currency altogether? If it simply adds to the mix? Now imagine that you own a piece of that pie. The right flavor of pie.

But let’s review. How is this new Bitcoin Bubble different than all the past bubbles? The Tulip, the and so on? It’s not.

For one, cryptocurrency goes to the very core of the economic engine. The grease in the machine. Money. It’s being remade, right before our eyes and we are witnessing a sea change of magnificent and yet, peaceful proportions.  A technology, by all appearances — an invention – that seems unstoppable.

That’s the line we are fed. The juggernaut is here! Open thy wallet! Be part of the crypto-saga.

Listen closely, do you hear the lonely winds? The howling of the vacant lot where you will keep your trailer, if you dare dump your life savings into cryptocurrency? There is no grand castle here. No amber waves of green. It’s you and bankruptcy.

“…sea of red.”

The sea of red. A confirmation of all the foolishness rides in. There is no one to blame, but yourself. It’s reality check time. Again. With bits of “pump-green.”

I’ve bitten those bullets more than once — and still profited. No, not with fancy options. Not with BTC loans. With study and more study. Similar to what one might do before a good game. Study the players. Study the coach. Who is the General Manager? What of the human element? Did the coach dump a good player and is the team facing that very same player now? (Revenge is a motivator.)

Bitcoin and clan tumbled from its highs. Few if any altcoins reverse that trend or if they do go against the tide of loss, they are mere pebbles bouncing along the bottom of the stream. Billions of dollars in value have changed hands. Early investors have unloaded and profited; and by the looks of things, they won’t be returning any time soon.

Or is that the “game plan?”

Add to that bad news, China’s recent moves to kill cryptocurrency in their country. And stop their citizens from trading cryptocurrency abroad. That’s a big hit. It is also a way to excise a cancer. China, after all, is not a free country by any standard. Removing a fickle financial partner will serve to stabilize the crypto-space in the freer countries.

The bad news just keeps on coming. Let’s face it. This whole space might go “poof.”

When the world got the first modern self-regulated substitute fiat monetary system, called bitcoin, it moved forward, however. It leaped forward. By any measure, it was and may still be, a technological-trust phenomenon for the ages. And humans need trust.

Bitcoin’s progeny? All the rest? The crypto-pack, if you will. They came to devour the bad money – to chase it out. And what a chase it has become. But will it survive?

The pot, however rusted and weak, then calls the new bitcoin kettle, black. The old guard bankers call bitcoin an irksome and annoying bubble.

How can an electronic fiat cryptocurrency ever hope to compete, much less replace, the singular corruption we have today? The devaluing government regulated fiat currency? Without the permission of governments themselves?

Kind of a conundrum, huh?

The banker’s soft gloves fit ever so snugly, over the bureaucrat’s fist, after all. And that is the primary problem today. We need to separate church and state, once again. Only, in this case, it’s the money and state we need to separate. Take the bankers soft gloves off, completely, and peacefully. For it is then, that we can focus on the naked fist of the apparatchik.

“…come home to roost.”

The past remarks from bankers, about cryptocurrency being a minor player, that its transaction volumes were minuscule by comparison, have now come home to roost. A once favored ridicule to comfort the sacred depositor and boost the ill-gotten gains of the fractional reserve inflation banking-gang, is gathering moss. The soft gloves are wearing thin. A horde of trust-technology, innovation-neophytes, are now squarely at odds with their nemesis: fiscal trust, i.e., cryptocurrency at large.

Cryptocurrency was a pastime, a fad, said the bankers saturated with the easy-print riches of government fiat. Essentially, those mongers of the viral-inflation, waited for cryptocurrency to stumble. And then, they attacked — again. A diminutive art of “financial” war, with the weapon of choice, the soft-gloved fist. Use of the fist, of course — the regulators — to tame the crypto-innovators.

It was not enough for the bankers to fire their bubble-gun news guns. We’ve heard endless tales of tulips and bitcoin. How bad it was. How bad it is. How bad it will be again.

And yet, some companies made it. Some weathered the storms of creative destruction, if I may borrow a term from Alan Greenspan, a man who once saw the merits of innovation, until he turned the old leaf over.

Among the wreckage of the bubble were survivors. Amazon, eBay, and others. The trick is to see through the barrage of altcoins. To determine the potential winners, beforehand. No easy task.

There will be survivors of this new “Bitcoin Bubble,” as it will come to be known. Which altcoin will make it?

“…a risk to speculate…”

After citing the bubble concerns, the soft-gloved banker-warriors will attack the small crypto-supply lines first. The credit lines, attached directly to their banks. That is in play now, in the U.S. It is a risk to speculate and the banks certainly do not wish to retain such risk. That’s understandable. But weren’t we all waiting for such a move anyway? The slow and easy squeeze? Until we joke about innovation that once was?

Next in line? Debit purchases. No, I don’t think banks will tell you how to spend your money. I think the fist will do that, and the soft gloved bankers will comply, naturally. It’s a team effort. One hand covers the dirty fist.

At the same time the banks are pulling the fiscal plugs to innovation, they are investing in the blockchain technology, and we all know this. But they forget one important factor: humans. We are not so fooled.

Humans know that the current monetary system is fraught with corruption and inflationary disease. Humans know that the dollar was infected long ago and it’s only a matter of time until it crawls into the gutter, like a dying drug addict, and spends its last. The fact that banks want to use the crypto-technology (blockchain) to move the old government fiat around, is not a solution. The infection will still kill the patient, one banker/drug user at a time.

Cryptocurrency, save for certain types (Stellar Lumens for one) are not infected with the fiat devaluation virus. They are limited in numbers. Any bank that uses the blockchain to move government fiat, is pushing the very same inflation virus. Consume with caution. For there will come a time when governments inject massive amounts of the virus, claiming it is medicine. Banks will don the soft gloves then, until they are completely worn out. Then, as the façade banks are today, they will die. The People’s Banks — only in name — will rise. If we allow it.

Here’s the next bit of good news, however. And I’m not the first one to report it. There is a tide approaching. Articulate and savvy investors with billions of virus-infected dollars (fiat money), not here to create cryptocurrencies or to buy stock in companies that are innovating in this arena, are here instead, to buy cryptocurrencies in volume. And remember, once a dollar (or any fiat) has been exchanged for the right cryptocurrency, the inflation virus dies. The patient recovers.

You can see hints of it now.

In the past, as I watched the billions pour into the crypto-sphere, I saw that many altcoins had inverse relationships. One would tank and another soar. Others just stayed the course. There was no general direction.

Fast forward to now. Many cryptocurrencies move in tandem. Is this a sign of institutional money flowing in and out? A sea change? And, are the bankers – the financial houses holding the lion’s share of the money – concerned about the coming withdrawals from their care? Why hold regulated money at all, if liquid cryptocurrency is available. Stability, of course, is the answer. But this alleged characteristic of fiat is the last gasp of devaluing currency.

Again, in the past, many financial researchers warned that the tide of incoming cryptocurrency monies would wreak havoc when the new investors panicked and ordered their brokers to sell. Massive outflows and inflows were expected, and this seems to be the case today. A Las Vegas style game.

Has this fear been manufactured?

Think about it another way. If you are a few years from retirement and willing to risk $10,000 or more in the crypto-markets, knowing it might just help you survive in the coming years; and knowing that your government has issued fiat money and it is beginning to remind you of the Venezuelan bolivar, why not try?

On the other hand, if you are not comfortable with the wild swings in value of the cryptosphere, you should probably stick with metals. Gold. Silver. Copper. Lug them around.

There is a “third way” though. If you are looking for a way to test the waters. To own a semi-cryptocurrency and at the same time, still be connected to the past-money. You might want to investigate Ripple XRP’s. This might also open the door to more gutsy investments in raw cryptocurrencies. Currently, you can use XRP’s to trade for many other cryptocurrencies at a fraction of the cost the exchanges charge. (We are slowly heading into “no-brainer” territory here.)


Note: the above is not advice. Stick with your bank advisor for that. I’m certain they will steer you in the right and “official” dollar-denominated direction.

Ripple XRP, and Billionaires?

What if you read some nice articles? Polished and professional reports, that provided good information about Ripple XRP’s and other cryptocurrencies, but you just wanted to verify that the website was reliable?

What if the blogs on this particular site only linked to a few sources?

What if the website then added more sources, after you questioned their integrity? That the links they originally posted no longer recycled you to their older stories?

What would you think?

What if the website in question only listed a single author’s name, but hinted that other experts contributed to the blogs? Wouldn’t you want to see the names of those experts — as authors of those particular blogs?

What if the website reported that it was related to other companies, owned by billionaires who wanted to raise taxes? Who supported the socialist policies of the left, in America?

Would this bother you?

Recently, I drilled down into for more details. I wanted to know where their website was located. Trust, but verify, right?

This article, about one of my favorite cryptocurrencies, got me started. Well, some say it’s not really a crypto and that’s just fine. This is not about Ripple, exactly. It’s more about trust. blasts out articles (blogs). Minute by minute. A deluge of fun. One after the other. All about payments and matters financial. And about Ripple.

I made a comment about on Reddit. Not always a good thing to do. Now, we all know that Reddit is not the front page of the internet. It’s full of nonsense and good stuff. You need to pull your own weeds. At the same time, you will often find hints of things. Hints that hit the real news hours or days later, or never.

And you will get down-voted on Reddit for asking controversial questions – especially questions about Such as, why is the website so secret? Why do they use a privacy service? And why the negative Reddit reaction?

I suspect that employees surf Reddit like there’s no tomorrow. In any event, when your questions are down-voted, your questions can be obscured from view. So, I asked myself why anyone would want to down-vote my concerns about on Reddit? On a public website? Bad press?

I no longer feel that is a click-bait organization. They don’t appear to have advertisements, so at most, they are just data mining the readers. Fine.

But, who owns and who registered the website?

I drilled down, but I did not use the website at first. I mean, anyone can write glowing reviews about themselves. I like to go to the disinterested parties first. See what they report. What’s the bad? What’s the BBB?

I used Google, Whois, BBB and Scamadviser. After all, when I drill down on, I can find all the goods. So, you’d think that an organization like wouldn’t make their details private. I mean other news sites don’t.

So, I look for any complaints about a website, before I trust their “news.” See if they are public or if they choose to hide their details. Meaning, do they broadcast their address, phone number and email address? Because even if a site has bad reviews, if they are public, at least you can verify them, right? You can state that “yes, the Whois record matches the public record and that matches the state corporate records and so on.” You can be reasonably sure that you are reading your preferred news slant from a favored organization.

Not so with They are a bit…shall we say, “shy.” And privacy is great, unless there are other political winds blowing. Say, Warren Buffet winds. Political and/or subtle propaganda-like winds…from leftist field?

The first indication that a website has an agenda, is when they do not list their address, phone number or email address. They use a privacy service. They make it difficult for you to find them. The alleged reason for this is to protect them from spam, potential identity theft, fraud and so on. After all, we all know that when we list our information on the internet, that big scary world can now…God forbid…see our stuff. Then every scammer spams you, wackos call you on the phone and your good name gets used on strange websites. It’s a difficult price to pay, but as a journalist, as a reporter of news, as a lister of facts, sometimes you need to take that step. The good guys don’t wear masks, but does.

Still, a site can build a reputation. They can report all sides of the issues and even repeatedly link back to their own blogs, as sources. So long as they occasionally throw in a good source now and again, one that can be verified, then sites like are the golden children, right? Even if they do not give credit to their writers. I mean, Mr. or Mrs. sure does write a lot. Is he a robot? Or is she many? Warm-blooded humans who are not getting recognized, publicly, for their good work?

And don’t read the job reviews here. Apparently, they have work-life balance issues, but these reviews might be old. They might all have lied too.

Back on the website, the first thing I noticed was that, unlike many websites their “About” link was grayed out and tiny. The idea here, is that you will overlook it. Or — that, the owner is not proud of the about-ness. Tell me different.

Now that’s interesting, I thought. You can click around, however. Try the Twitter feed. Go to their Facebook “about” page. Still, their information was limited. I ask again, why?

Okay, dump those titillating conspiracy theories. There is no way on earth that a billionaire is financing the fight against cryptocurrencies, using obscured websites, to slowly and quietly turn the tide of crypto-free-thinkers back toward the cesspool of fiat currency failures. No way, right?

But following the pymnts.comabout” link, you end up at a description page. The page advises that they are “#1,” but as usual, no source is cited. It’s like saying you make the World’s Finest Soda for Buffet. Great, I get it. I’m #1 too, just ask my dog. I my #1 was appointed too!

But here’s the fun part. The twisted birth. Let us follow the pregnancy, shall we? This is according to, of course. is brought to you by What’s Next Media and Analytics, LLC. (formerly known as 1st in Media)

The CEO of What’s Next is Karen Webster, who is, we are advised, a globally recognized authority in payments and commerce and a widely quoted author. Webster has assembled a team of leading economists, data analytic experts, management consultants, and journalists to provide cutting edge analysis.

In 2009, What’s Next was partly founded/owned by Market Platform Dynamics, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway and an investor and advisor to clients who want to envision and execute effective multi-sided platform (“matchmaker”) strategies.

Did I mention Market Platform Dynamics‘ listed CEO? Karen Webster.

What’s Next is also partially owned by Continental Advisors LLC., an investment advisor that funds new ventures in payments and commerce.

Business Wire, a wholly owned subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway handles global market/commercial news and disclosure distribution, and is the exclusive press release service for

What you just read is a bit convoluted. I apologize. But I didn’t do it.

The upshot is that Warren Buffet has skin in this game. And Buffet does not like Bitcoin. There are articles like this all over the net. Does he like Ripple XRP? Hard to say. He seems to see a bad ending for cryptocurrencies in general. But are XRP’s really a type of  cryptocurrency? And is Buffet attempting to insure the “bad ending?”

Back to Now, we can’t confirm ownership of through Whois or Scamadviser or even where its website is located – since the website uses to privatize its information.

The fact that Buffet’s company, Berkshire Hathaway, owns some interest in Market Platform Dynamics, which then partially owns What’s Next Media and Analytics, LLC., which brings us, should be enough to satisfy the curious, right? Not.

We can google CEO Karen Webster all day long and even What’s Next Media and Analytics, LLC.  We can see on that the LLC is a foreign one filed in 2016. So, is a foreign based website? I’d like to know the country. I’m just curious that way. A bio on just doesn’t cut it for me. Linkedin is a start. And I’m sure Karen is fabulous. I just have issues with the political philosophy of one particular billionaire she might know.

We can use the website to search for references to and we can see, via Whois, that unlike, the website location (the United States) and many other details. Their “about” link gives you a world of information. And you can double-check Business Wire on

So, why is – the website – using a privacy service? Inquiring minds want to know.

Now to The site chosen by, to host their website. Think like a billionaire philanthropist. Think like a politician. Various internet searches will lead you to articles like this one. It appears that Hillary Clinton also liked “Hillary Clinton paid to hide the identity of the people running her private email server, Breitbart News has learned.” That was two years ago, from Brietbart. Interesting.

According to the Brietbart article, is owned by Network solutions…which is owned by Both organizations have had their share of complaints. And uses them?

Who else uses for website privacy? Continental Advisors LLC. Remember them? They partly own along with Market Platform Dynamics.

Oh, and the perfect privacy folks also hide their own owner’s identity and website location. Go figure.

At any rate, a lot interesting stuff seems to swirl around Here’s one issue presented by Cisco in 2015, about PayPal phishing. Consumers Union reported student loan scams in 2016. And the list goes on.

I’m not saying that is a scam site. Not at all. Just that scammers and  politicians make for good company.


Ditch until they have the guts to come clean and stop using website privacy services, that criminals are apparently using.

But, when it comes right down to it, I really don’t care if Warren Buffet influences the blog, even if he a is left-leaning, increase-the-taxes, socialist. I don’t care if the website is private or that there are no author names. is free to publish and hint that Ripple XRP’s may perish from this earth and that SWIFT will rule with inflationary fiats until the universe ends.

What I do care about is an organization like that won’t publicize their website and website owner information. That we, as readers, can then judge if the information presented is coming from journalists we trust.

If we can connect the dots (the presented information) that we can then find on the website, to the dots on Whois or Scamadviser, easily, then could be more clearly judged. If we can’t know the names of all the experts that contribute to “news,” I ask why? Won’t this lack of transparency cast doubt upon the reporting? You bet. Unless you are a trusting soul.

Until then, my suggestion is to use a web service you trust and one that does not publish news from the private recesses of privileged anonymity. And, a site, that does not use its own blog as a reference – repeatedly. That’s bad form, if you want to be credible — and taken seriously.

The old guard must step aside, that the new guard may finance the future.

Bitcoin is about trust.

Is about trust?



Clif High: Energy, Auras, Inter-Dimensional Entities, and Bitcoin!

If you don’t know Clif High by now – and you follow cryptocurrencies – I’d be surprised. The thing is, if you try to obtain any recent stuff, without purchasing one of his reports, it is becoming more and more difficult. There are numerous ‘name droppers’ out there who use his name or play older versions of his videos. Even audio clips are fair game. It becomes confusing.

And many call Clif a fraud and a charlatan. His backward views, Eastern Religious slant, steeped in the stagnant views of the cultures of failure, Buddhism, Gnosticism, I Ching-ism, etc., are well expressed. But his alleged combination of the scientific method, his blending of math and magic, witches and warlocks, without validating the math (in a public forum) is at best disingenuous. At worst, it is fraud. For this, I am of the opinion, that Clif is no better than your local Palm Reader, who just googled all the specs on you – as he/she conducted your reading.

The more I listen to Clif, in his various videos, the more I am reminded of my many thousands of interviews (and interrogations) of the criminally insane. The way they sort of randomly knit things together, in a hodgepodge patchwork of mystical platitudes. And how they can never stay on topic – and always want you to agree with them.

This is what Clif High does. And really, it’s not much different than what an astrologer does, except we know they are full of it, don’t we? We hope they, guys like Clif or the Palm Reader down the street, might have some special insight, and that is the weakness they prey upon – that all to human thing we call “hope.”

I just wanted to take a little time to “log” a few more of Clif’s words of wisdom for future fun and comparison. Many see Clif as a future seer. A new age psychic. They trust him like you might trust a pastor or a father figure, albeit, a father with some rather radical ideas and zero evidence, empirical or otherwise. In other words, Clif’s predictions, as far as I have been able to discover, are and have always been unsubstantiated. A fantasy, based on mythology. Twisted and disfigured. Oh, what a tangled web Clif weaves.

I went over this video from January 19, 2018. It was a discussion about several topics. But I pulled out a sampling for readers. This is not a transcript. It is a selection of topics. It may help you understand or just confuse you. Two women astrologer types ask Clif a series of questions. What follows is a blur of beliefs. (I will put my comments in parentheses.)

To set the stage.

Clif spoke of spiritual wars (my label), reincarnation, answered questions about sorcerers, and mentioned that in the past, shaman had been targeted for elimination by European powers around the time of the Spanish Conquistadors. He also spoke of people who channel, time, and many other things, including cryptocurrencies.

Here are my selections. In my estimation, one’s thoughts ought to be integrated, but you may feel that contradictory, conspiratorial and even unverifiable beliefs are sacrosanct. In any case, one should know the man, before making cryptocurrency investments – based upon his prognostications.

War, Energy and Cycles

Clif was asked about a war. Not a traditional one, but perhaps a spiritual one. His answers seemed to slip into several areas, so I nut-shelled them herein. They may seem a bit disjointed. Remember, we are in the Woo-Woo world now. Fasten your logic. Suspend all belief, before proceeding.

Clif High indicated…

There has been a shift, people are feeling…there is a craziness in response to these feelings.

We are in a higher level “energy” space Clif said. He explained this energy by referencing what the Russians indicated in 1984, about an energy envelope around our solar system – a cosmic energy – that alters us and our environment. (No source is given.)

This energy and cyclical patterns, such as planetary shifts, depending upon the “spiral relative to earth” … “behind the sun” contributes to a giant energy change. A major cycle, Clif advised, was the 425-year cycle, with a 125-year duration. (No source.) And we’ve already “transitioned” [into this duration?] and the “Age of Aquarius has meaning” because of this. In other words, it has a “core” meaning, because of this energy.

(I’m sure you got that, right? Let’s move on.)

To further describe, Clif said that…

…in 1994, we obtained new energies in the form of a “new type of UV ray.”

That UV rays are of type A, B, C, and D now. And D type is rare, with the only recorded reading beginning around 2006 – on the earth’s surface. (Like Wikipedia says – citation needed.)

Clif advised that we are caught within a conflict of energies. That our antennas are receiving these energies as individuals and groups, and then we ‘express’ these energies, but “harmony” is missing on the planet.

Clif spoke of an astrologer who indicated that his (Clif’s) chart (shall we assume his astrological chart?)  indicated that he was…

…“born a warrior.”

Clif feels the “war impulses.” That the war in question, has been going on for a long time, but it’s now at a “consciousness level.” A hearts and minds battle that can be seen in things like the media and the alternative media, and that the latter is replacing the former.

(Does this mean fantasy is replacing reality? What media is being replaced? And by what alt-media? Blank out.)

Clif advised, as an example, that YouTube is thought to be a male dominated media space. The space was used by about 80% males, but that is changing. (Source?) That this is one of the expressions in this larger war. That in ancient times, when elephants were used to fight wars, in the future – due to this increasing energy – we will be shooting energy rays at each other, instead. That this is a progression to the war of consciousness or perhaps between them.

The war of consciousness was again explored. Clif referenced a banned Ted Talk, but he couldn’t recall the details. He said that the powers-that-be have corrected or edited what can be let into our consciousness – as the accepted view of reality. This has been going on for about 500 years.  We are about 425 years into this cycle as the two-major planets circle to our side of the sun. When this happens, major upheavals occur. We are 75 years overdue for a major “social revolution” and a lot of “dangerous thoughts” are breaking out on YouTube.

Inter-Dimensional Beings and Channeling

When asked about the ability of humans to see inter-dimensional beings, perhaps with a sensitivity to the newly discovered UV rays, (remember the “D” ones) Clif explained that “no” it did not work that way. But these beings do exist, according to Clif. They exist in “multiple” forms. Some can be photographed, such as the “strange worms” that fly in the upper atmosphere. These appear to hover over military bases and look down on nuclear bombs and stuff. The assumption is that these worms are “life forms.” (Assumption? Source?)

As for “channeling,” Clif said that there are basically two kinds. One is fraudulent, encountered at times when psychiatrists attempt to hypnotize. This is because the mind will give you any answer. Any answer to get you “off its back,” so to speak. It is similar to extremely enhanced imagination.

The next kind of “channeling” (more legitimate as implied by Clif) relates to meditation, which is the removal of the “discriminating mind” from the process. In other words, the thinking mind is set aside for the “reactive mind,” that you can then respond. A partial use of the mind. In this kind of channeling, you give over a part of yourself – not your soul – but you are not in total control. You move part of yourself from your personality in this process. The personality then supplies the energy to another “entity form” that then supplies the “information.”

(I’m not going to repeat that.)

To further explain, as per Clif, good channeling diverts from meditation at a “very key level.”

In “pure” meditative states, you never surrender the “self.”

The idea or purpose in a meditative state is to examine the self, correct its flaws, model it, and similar. You dive into the self. Whereas, with the “channeling form” or good version, you get it [the self] out of the way and it’s “just not there.”

With the good channeling form, un-reconciled, un-harmonious thoughts, that are out in the universe as “waves” can have enough power to be able to drain or attach themselves like a limpet to the mind, that has moved the self “out of there.” The channeling person then receives information from outside of him or herself.

With this kind of channeling, when you connect with this other entity, you have no idea what the other entity “is.” This entity will tell you things, using what it finds in your mind, letting you hear what you want to hear. The entity does this – channels – by using your “life energy.” (Do we give the entity permission to energy suck?)

At some point in his life, when he was “doing aikido” and when he was “extremely sensitive to the auras,” Clif witnessed “channels.” Clif said, as these people channeled, he saw their “strange” auras as they “dampened down” and went to one side of their head. On the other side of their heads, “threads” extended outward and above, into a “foggy area.” The bigger the witnessing audience, the more energy the entity can gather for the process.

The “entities” are desperate to give you what you want to continue the process.

At the time when Clif witnessed this channel, he was sensitive to it, to auras and such, but he was in control of his self (his “I”). He advised that he was only there as an observer – and he was freaked out by it.

Clif said that he has witnessed this latter form of channeling twice. Once by a multimillionaire (or at least a person who used to be wealthy) but he did not identify the second person.

Bashar. Spelling unknown. This name was mentioned several times in passing. Apparently, this Bashar channels and if you are sensitive to it, and if under some forms of fluorescent lighting, you can see evidence of this process.

Channeling can be dangerous.

The person who channels will “pay the price” in their next life. The price being the inability to tell the difference between “reality and unreality” in that next life. They will be twisted, mentally deficient kinds of people, i.e., schizophrenics. There is a lot of information from the yogis, which supports his “understanding” of this process, Clif advised.

Time and Reincarnation

As to “time” we do in this life, refer to it in a linear fashion, Clif advised. “Perhaps” time can be better defined as a loop, because “within time we know that there are many cycles.” These cycles coordinate, lump together and similar. (Great!) Within this time-loop construct, as Clif understands the cosmology/reality of it, he is but 1/12th of 1/3rd of his “greater being.” There are five more beings (bodies), that may or may not look like his body, when they “incarnate.” These other beings, share his current “I-ness.” There are also six female bodies that share his/the “I-ness.”

The routine, as it applies to the pre-incarnates, is a male then female incarnation in “series.”

Going back to time, Clif explained that this loop of time makes the idea of before and after an inappropriate description. Depending upon what part of the loop you or your incarnate occupy, as the loop runs (my understanding) you may be recycling in a time – re-looping.

Clif also indicated that there is a “long rest” period between your heaven and your hell. The more energetic you are in your life, it is thought, the longer the rest is. And those who do not get enough of this pre-incarnate rest, can end up insane. This also explains why high-energy people will “betray” that they have an affinity for a time in the past. In other words, they were resting longer and that was their previous time loop period – as I understand it.

Regression Reading Theory and Coaching

Regression to 500 years or even 3000 years in the weird time-loop, also explains this long rest idea, Clif advised. For example, during regression research, people may give bogus information, but information from the last correct time-loop period, in which they lived. This explains why some might report that they were Cleopatra in a past (time-looped) life, when they may have simply lived in that period as a common citizen.

Both the psychic and participant during a “reading” (regression process), can be described as “antennas,” Clif advised. Each is a “standing wave.” In other words, they are not solid, really. The balanced and sensitive psychic, via induction, due to his/her proximity to the participant, picks up the broadcasting/receiving from the participant. Psychics induce a sympathetic ripple to see what is going on inside the participant’s standing wave. Although the “reading” may be 100% valid, the source is unknown. Whether it emanated from the participant’s mind or was expressing some “temporal peg to what’s going on.” Hence, questioning is a good idea, but discounting the reading’s impressions are not necessary.

As a standing wave, however, we are not necessarily in-tuned to our own interpretations. (Unclear.) A psychic’s mind might receive “temporal peg” impressions, like the type of clothing a person was wearing in a past life.

Speaking in Tongues

Clif advised that “speaking in tongues” could be a sign of mental health problems. He refers to it as the first kind of channeling and that it is false or invalid, if it is deliberate. Often these “snake handler” types induce a fugue-like state, but it does not necessarily involve a connection to the entities, previously indicated.

The Standing Wave Antenna User Manual

Some psychics use a Daoist-like (or Tao) system to read people. This is similar to sampling the zeitgeist at a given moment. In the Dao, the Dao that can be named, it is not the Dao, Clif advised. Or the pulse that can be named, is not the pulse. Once one says or identifies the “pulse” it has already happened many times over.

This kind of “awareness sampling” is using our standing wave antennas, taking a snap shot of “it” at that moment, as a representative sample – of where the rest of the universe is – and seeing how those vibrations are then influencing our standing wave antenna. This is an extremely valid way to guide yourself through reality, Clif said.

The Chinese formalized this system in the “I Ching,” and things like the divination sticks. Other societies would “gut” chickens and read the entrails. These are attempts to read the “pulse” that is left on reality, Clif advised. Using these readings, as our brains are pattern matching machines, people would then forecast the future.

In a sense, this is what Clif says he does. He samples the zeitgeist using different languages. In a psychic’s process, if they can keep their standing wave antenna properly aligned (my explanation), readings might be more accurate than Clif’s (webbot?) process. But only if the psychic can filter out “the mind” which will try to answer the questions posed and trick the psychic. As a way to ‘tune in,’ sometimes the psychic will need to coach the mind to relax, to let go and not answer questions, to just be there, that one can hear the “pinging of the universe.” This is really where our “psychic envelope” exists.

Not as we see

Our bodies are not as we see them. We are layered egg-shaped energy fields. The key, is to tune yourself to reach out to your own fields and feel the other energies coming in. In this way, a psychic, may sense the evil (my word) energies coming from others and actually have a physical/emotional (fear) response.


The Gnostics were trying to say, and Clif agrees with them, based on reviewing evidence, that the Archons are real. They are easy, usually, to defeat and have to do with the war, mentioned previously. Think of them as the dark side of the force, Clif advised.

Clif indicated that the killing of a Gnostic leader (Hypatia) in ancient Greece, is directly related to bad things happening thousands of years later. He spoke of the destruction of the Knights Templar, by the Roman Catholic Church and the King of France. The Inquisition then, began since the Templars were out of the way.

Later, when Gnostics in Southern France were reincarnated, they recalled this battle against them. They may not have had the “knowledge” of past lives, but the viewpoint goes from life to life to life. As an example, Clif advised that in his next life, he will still be the same old bastard.

However, Clif does foresee that for the next few thousand years, we will subdue the Archons. Then things recycle, and they, the darkling ones, will subdue the good.

Turning People

There was an interesting discussion about how the Japanese, during war, turned enemy spies into weapons against their former masters. That this was considered the best weapon of all.

The Truth

Clif also advised that holding to the truth (that was the truth) was also a great weapon. (Make sense? No.)

The universe provides what we need to struggle against; the challenges that we need. We may not necessarily want those challenges. You can even ignore these challenges, but eventually, even if in a future life, you will have to accept and deal with them.

Sexual Intercourse and Pedophiles and other Conspiracies

It is possible, that during sexual intercourse, a bidirectional energy exchanges occurs. That this process – exchange – builds one’s energy. The exchange energy transmits through the vagus nerve system and other parts of the body, except the adrenals.

Why is this important? The pedophiles of course! Because those pedophiles want to extract youth/longevity energy from unwilling participants. They attack/dominate children to accomplish this. In a pedophile’s mind, after puberty, those youth energies and the post-pubescent persons themselves, are less susceptible to theft or extraction of their “energies.” After puberty, certain key forces (vibrations) – energies – do change, according to Clif.

The pedophile thinks he/she can harvest the adrenal (maybe he meant pineal) glands of children(?) and make this into a drug, that may be taken intramuscularly. They are attempting to obtain a portion of the “distilled universe” in the form of adrenal gland extract(?) – and get something out of it.

(The above appears to be based on a conspiracy theory. See this video for more. If this has any truth, however, it is disturbing. Thus far, I have found zero validation, however – so don’t sweat it.)

Clif advised that there is an addiction side to this issue and if you research Satanism, for example, you will find the underlying idea of an energy transfer. An energy vampire etc. Drinking blood? CEO’s from corporations transfusing blood from children? (Come on. Where’s the source Clif? Just one.)

The implication here, is that the system (powers-that-be) is just now coming to grips with the reality of all of this and it will take years to get the word out. Clif gave an example of Prince “Chucky” who had a life-long friend who was a necrophile. The implication, Clif implied, was that the prince might also be involved. And that the English have not reconciled this problem. The House of Windsor will fall? (No sources given. Careful Clif, you might piss-off a Royal.)

Clif goes onto hint that Obama’s $64,000 pizza parties were related to pizza gate? That Oprah Winfrey knew? (Careful, Cliffy.)

Zen’s Lenses

Examining the “I-ness” in a Zen State, where nothing else exists. As you head in this path it makes you question things. The universe makes us as we are, Clif indicated, bringing us into existence at a particular time and place, under stars, aligned to prescribe our characteristics., i.e., astrology.

In Clif’s case, he was brought into this universe as a warrior, in a time of warriors – at the height of wars. That’s why he spent nearly two decades in the military. (That’s what he implied.)

The best that Clif can do, even in times of peace, is to harmonize with the universe – as it designed him. To become the best warrior he can, at every level. (His words.) That we are essentially universe tools. That “universe” (not ‘the universe’) has a task in mind?

Cryptocurrency Related

Bitcoin, after it is mined out, will still have things like Rootstock. Fees can still be collected via running smart contracts and therefore support the network. Bitcoin becomes scarcer at that point, but it also becomes more of a known factor.

Moving on.

Litecoin, will reach approximately 1/5th of a bitcoin in value. It will be used for point of sale and Amazon might use it as well. No dates/times given.

Pillar, will have an unknown price point, but it will become the primary wallet to compete against. March 2018 is good?

Populous, is a strategic hold. Passive income. Years in the future, holders may be like “trust fund kids.”

Ethereum will continue its up and down pattern. Competing against bitcoin and because of its niche, it’s against EOS – the Ethereum killer. It will also have to contend with Rootstock.

Monero and Cloakcoin are showing up in Clif’s reports in small numbers – bits of chatter.

Sidenote: The use of cryptocurrency in any large way, by drug cartels and such, would spike their prices – bitcoin at millions per coin. It would be difficult to use cryptocurrency in this way.


Attention EconomyClif mentions “Metcalf,” but he was uncertain of the name. Compares cryptocurrency or interest in it, as a self-driving force or growing attention economy. A positive feed back loop and not a tulip bubble, for example.

Hydrogenated Water – Clif says it gives you energy, but magnesium additives leave residues. The hydrogenated water does not alter the taste, he said.

Shampoo and Deodorant – Clif says he doesn’t use either. But he does use natural sandalwood soaps…and they are “harmonious.”

The Chemtrail Conspiracy – Someone has to be paying for them. The military has become very subcontractor dependent. During the recent government shutdown, Clif posited that these contractors might be exposed, if payment for their services did not arrive. The implication was that the government is paying for the services.

On 9/11/2001 – when the terrorists knocked down the Twin Towers – everyone should have been aware that the chemtrail spraying stopped. (Planes were grounded.)

About four days after planes were once again allowed to fly (in the US) after 9/11, the chemtrails reappeared. This, according to Clif, validates the conspiracy. (Source? None.)

Thinking and Destiny – Clif mentions a book titled Thinking and Destiny. He explained that some of the ideas he discussed herein, are from that book. He gives a short synopsis of the book in the video, about Doers and Thinkers and how this process of learning is carried over during reincarnation. (Note: some fiction authors read this book.)

Alcohol – Drinking as opposed to using marijuana, opens one up to Archonic (evil) forces. The translation of the Arabic word for alcohol, for example, is ghoul, Clif stated. To decompress, one should use one of the seven plant teachers. Clif gave an example: THC. Clif said he tried to drink when he was in his 40’s but it messed with his vibrations.

And that is all for now. I hope you enjoyed this version of reality with Clif.

Be careful where you get your cryptocurrency information.









Cryptocurrency, ZeroHedge and Clif High

Dear Crypto-Readers,

There are two places on the net where cryptocurrency and other information is highly suspect.

Use these sites and people, at your own risk.

They are:

  • Clif High
  • ZeroHedge

Coming from an investigative background, the fact that this “fake news” spills over into the cryptocurrency environment, is not news. The news is the reliance by some bloggers and hidden “news” sites, upon questionable sources. In fact, even legitimate organizations sometimes cite questionable sources.




You bet. It’s all about the ad revenue. Even I like that. Last month, I took my wife to dinner with the money I made on this blog. Thanks readers.

But first, before ZeroHedge (I will not link to this site due to security risks) I want to bring up an internet personality. I have mentioned him before: Clif High. (I’ve linked to a previous piece I wrote about him.)

Suffice to say, Clif High appears to sell conspiracy theories, based upon his belief in ESP. He is the silver-tongued devil of the future, that never quite materializes. He makes blatantly false predictions and it’s a wonder people continue to support him. It’s curiosity, he’s fun to watch, but also morbidly interesting. 

As an investigator for several decades, I had the opportunity to interview/interrogate thousands of criminally insane people. For these reasons, I sometimes watch Clif High. I’m not saying the guy is insane, I’m not a doctor. However, Clif sure leaves that door wide open. And, I’m guilty — I still watch him.

But Clif High, even if that is a pseudonym, puts his face to the music. Maybe he likes the attention – the fame. Many folks with that burning desire to be recognized, live fruitful, public lives. They are entertainers, in a sense. And we pay to be entertained. Of course, he has his diehard cult following. So be it. At least his detractors can lambast him – publicly. And Clif dishes it back out. At least Clif has the guts to stand in the limelight, be it the laser of truth or his ever-changing contrarian view of the near future.

And you have to respect old Clif’s tenacity.

Then there is the dark side. The shadow conspiracies. The quasi-blogs and secret “.orgs” plying their trade. Is it real or is it fluff?

Aside from the accusations against Clif High (see link above and read reader comments) at least he’s not hiding like ZeroHedge. Those people publish and hide so completely, that every word they type, is suspect. Sure, we know that anonymous reporters can uncover information, but at some point, the information can be verified. Not at ZeroHedge. At least not most of it.

For all of Clif High’s odd beliefs, he has on occasion, chowed down on ICO altcoins, torn them asunder and spat out a decent review.  I wish he’d take after ZeroHedge.

I used to read ZeroHedge. It’s fun. A sort of Dredge-the-Bottom Report. Occasionally, it puts you on a trail of something good. Something interesting. However, after the site was probably hacked I refused to visit. In fact, in a sense, it is unethical for anyone to hide a link in their blog, to a potentially risky site and not advise readers of same.

What do I mean?

Legitimate bloggers should choose to protect, as much as possible, their readers’ digital security. If there is even a hint that a website is hacked, has an unknown or hidden location, is based in a risky country, has owners from risky countries or in any way makes them suspicious, then they should not link to the site.

Am I perfect? No. Could I make a mistake and cite a source from a website that is spinning its news? Sure. Usually, I let you know if I think the source is off the mark, however. And if the “writer” uses a pseudonym, like me, no problem. If you cite legitimate sources, you’re golden. Hell, many reporters and writers have dozens of handles.

But Tyler Durden? The Wikipedia entry about ZeroHedge, should make anyone sit up and take notice:

“Zero Hedge’s content has been classified as “alt-right,” anti-establishment, conspiratorial, and economically pessimistic, and has been criticized for presenting extreme and sometimes pro-Russian views.”

Not only should the pro-Russian views clue us in, but the “conspiracy” classification is on par with Clif High’s antics. Take both sources cum grano salis – with a grain of salt. And take Wikipedia itself with a grain of salt. Check their sources as well.

According to Business Insider, at least one of three men suspected of working/writing for ZeroHedge, a Bulgarian by the name of Daniel Ivandjiiski, was “kicked out of the securities industry during the height of the financial crisis in 2008 for insider trading.”

Another suspect ZeroHedge man, Colin Lokey, may be:

“…an emotionally unstable, psychologically troubled alcoholic with a drug dealer past…”

Tim Backshall, a 45-year-old credit derivatives strategist is another suspected writer for the conspiratorial newsletter-blog. This @credittrader appears to be his Twitter account. His listed website is You guessed it all hidden info. And his tweets are full of ZeroHedge charts. Curious.

There was also a hint that Colin Lokey used or invented the Daniel Ivandjiiski and Tim Blackshall names.

But ZeroHedge does not always post unsubstantiated or bogus news. In fact, they have been accused of outright plagiarism. Lifting or citing other stories that they could then blend into their narrative. Generally, it’s a pessimistic view of world finance and politics, and the environment. One sided. On the other hand, their stories are often hard-hitting, provocative and full of charts. Just don’t go checking their sources. You’ll find that the numbers don’t always jive. Some have accused ZeroHedge of 90% lies, 10% questionable facts.

In any event, before you visit ZeroHedge do a little research. A little Scamadviser checking and internet backstory reads. Here’s what I found. I added to the already growing number of concerns about ZeroHedge as well.

Four Risks of ZeroHedge

Risk #1 – You are being Hacked

Let us start with this. Did you know that every time you visit the ZeroHedge website to read a blog, you may be risking your digital health? The website may be hacked. This alone, if you are serious about keeping your money and identity safe, should be enough. But let us add fuel to the fire.

Risk #2 – Mystery Website

Each time you visit the ZeroHedge website, from where are those bits and bytes flowing? The origin country? Well, there is a good chance you are reading a Canadian alt-right website or maybe you are pulling data straight from the US or the UK, but the fact is, the location of the ZeroHedge website is unknown. It could just as easily be in Moscow.

Risk #3 – Mystery Owner(s)

Who owns the ZeroHedge Website or company? Well, not Tyler Durden. That’s just comedy. The fact is, the owner’s identity is unknown.

There are only a few good reasons to remain anonymous. You are divulging legitimate secrets and you are concerned about your safety. You are lying like hell and are also concerned about your safety. There are other reasons to remain hidden as well, including using the anonymous angle to make others think you are a “deep throat” and not a run-of-the-mill click-baiter. To make money from the advertisers is another great reason to create and use the anonymous mystique.

Risk #4 – Bad Actors?

Although there is no “guilt by association,” unless the strings connect, an associated business service/address is ABCMedia 300A-219 Dufferin St. Toronto M6K 3J1. They are the web service for ZeroHedge.

Here is a google map of that location, in Canada.

The actual name of the service is easyDNS Technologies, Inc. They are known to be associated with Wikileaks, according to this Wikipedia entry. The company owner’s name and country is hidden, but it could be Mark Jeftovic. The website location is also uncertain.

Here is Mark Jeftovic’s Twitter account…easyDNS CEO. Libertarian. Contrarian. Bookish. The “E” stands for “easy,” as it states on Twitter. He is a known blogger (curious) in the ZeroHedge vein, on That’s a potentially risky website, hence no link. Suffice to say, it’s almost like reading “early” ZeroHedge.

The address is listed as 67 Mowat Ave, Toronto, ON, M6K 3E3. That is here. It’s the Toronto Carpet Factory. If you notice, it’s adjacent to the Dufferin Street address of ABC Media.

If you look, you will also see another website listed on Jeftovic’s twitter account: The name speaks for itself. It’s a newer hidden website, with a hidden owner in a secret country. Its listed address, you guessed it, Dufferin Street. Try 304A-219 Dufferin Street, Toronto, M6K 3J1 to be exact.

There is other curious news about EasyDNS as well.

According to The Register (United Kingdom) in a 2013 article titled “Canadian operator EasyDNS stands firm against London cops.” The Police’s Intellectual Property Crime Unit requested the EasyDNS take down websites selling pirated music/movies. EasyDNS refused. Did they support crime? Seems that way.

When you compare ZeroHedge’s “use” of copyrighted materials, to EasyDNS allowing hosted sites to profit on pirated content, things appear to shift alt-right, in tandem.

Furthermore, from Wikipedia in 2014, “…CEO Mark Jeftovic referred to the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy as a “batch of clowns” after it sent EasyDNS and other registrars a document issuing guidelines on when to take down domains of suspected “rogue” pharmacies without court orders. The memo included instructions which would put registrars in violation of their ICANN Registrar Accreditation Agreements.”

What happened? Death.

“Some months later EasyDNS modified its takedown policy after a man died after taking a “controlled substance” codeine phosphate purchased without a prescription from, an online drug seller registered through easyDNS Technologies Inc. EasyDNS was not aware of’s presence on their system, or the fatality until they were contacted by a Wall Street Journal reporter investigating ICANNs policies on unlicensed pharmacies. ICANN had not notified EasyDNS of either the FDA complaint nor the fatality. Once informed, EasyDNS initiated contact with the FDA and the domain was immediately taken down. EasyDNS now requires online pharmacies to provide proof that they are licensed.”

Another source of Jeftovic’s blogs is Again, I won’t link to that site since there have been reports of hacking there as well.



In conclusion, the websites and names associated with ZeroHedge are fishy, to say the least. The site itself, may have been hacked, putting any visitor’s digital information at risk — and this includes bank accounts. The hosting service (easyDNS Technologies Inc.) for ZeroHedge may have and may still be, assisting criminals — the ones who steal digital information. The name/owner associated with the hosting service are also associated with websites and are hosted in unknown countries. The hosting service in question is associated with WikiLeaks and could simply be a mouthpiece for them…and WikiLeaks has been known to compromise identities, to include medical information and social security numbers of individuals —  per this Wikipedia entry.

But you be the judge. Buy/sell cryptocurrency or stocks, based on ZeroHedge’s advice and see what happens.

Or use common sense.

Personally, I don’t think the current “correction” in cryptocurrency is a correction at all. This stuff is outside of the normal channels. It sings to its own tune. That tune, in my thinking, is you.

Choose the dying fiat “reality” or choose — just a little — freedom cryptocurrency. But remember, both exist.


 — JGS

Bytecoin: Peel the Onion

Dear Readers,

As always, I peruse the cryptosphere, in search of answers. When it comes to Bytecoin, however, the answers are always just out of reach.

So this will be short.

It’s not the answer to the Nicolas van Saberhagen mystery, but it is an invitation to a place where you can plumb the depths.

Here at Reddit, I’ve created a new sub:

Reddit - Copy

It’s place where I hope the curious will come to discuss the history of Bytecoin, CryptoNote and other “Dstrange” things. It’s the unofficial page and news. A place where the latest good and bad news can be gathered — without censorship. 

There’s no agenda here, except the truth.

To the right of the main page (of the subreddit), I am building a loose timeline. The idea being, others can use this to compare and share any gems they have come across. Also, if anyone is convinced that Bytecoin is above board, they can come back and remind themselves — why or why not.



Jack Shorebird

%d bloggers like this: